Behind the Book: Our authors share the story behind the birth of their book.

Behind the Book: Phillip Cary on Good News for Anxious Christians

Today Phillip Cary shares why he wrote Good News for Anxious Christians.

Good News for Anxious Christians

The subtitle of Good News for Anxious Christians tells much of the story. It was almost 10 Practical Ideas You Don’t Have to Apply to Your Life, except that subtitle got a little too long to fit on the cover.

I’m not a fan of practical ideas—the kind you’re supposed to apply to your life. Especially when someone’s preaching them at you, because then you’re supposed to feel there’s something wrong with you if you’re not applying those ideas to your life.

That’s how you get a lot of anxious Christians who wonder what’s wrong with them. Why am I not hearing God speak in my heart? Why can’t I seem to find God’s will for my life? Why am I not experiencing inner joy all the time?

The good news is that these “practical ideas” are not in the Bible, so we don’t have to worry about whether we’re applying them to our lives. In that regard I’m all for sola scriptura, the Reformation principle of “Scripture alone.”

Phillip Cary

As the Reformers emphasized, what we get in the Bible is law and gospel. The law of God is not practical advice but commandments, which show us the way to live worthwhile lives. And the gospel, thank God, does not tell us what to do but gives us Jesus Christ himself. The result is that we get not only salvation in Christ but also the strength to live according to God’s law.

In other words, I want to recover the old Protestant piety of the Word of God, which I think evangelicals are in danger of losing as they drown in practical ideas that make them anxious. If we want transformed lives, all the practical advice in the world is no help. What we need to hear is the gospel of Jesus Christ.

For it is what Christ does, not what we do, that makes all the difference. And it is precisely that gospel truth which frees us to do everything differently, with love and comfort and joy instead of anxiety.

—————————

Phillip Cary (PhD, Yale University) is professor of philosophy at Eastern University in Pennsylvania as well as scholar-in-residence at the Templeton Honors College. He is the author of Jonah in the Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible and of three critically acclaimed books on the life and thought of Augustine.

For more information on Good News for Anxious Christians, click here.

Behind the Book: Bryan Litfin on Getting to Know the Church Fathers

Today Bryan M. Litfin shares why he wrote Getting to Know the Church Fathers.

When someone asks me what I do for a living, and I say I’m a professor whose academic expertise is the early church fathers, I often receive a blank stare. Christians today rarely have any idea of who the early church fathers might be. If this is true in your case, I believe you are missing something valuable. To illustrate what I mean, let me tell you a story about a boy I call Billy.

Getting to Know the Church Fathers

Little Billy loved his grandmother very much. His childhood years were filled with visits to her house after school or on Sunday afternoons. If while playing in the yard Billy happened to fall and scrape a knee, Grandma was there with some old-fashioned concoction to tend his wound (though in truth her comforting words accomplished far more as a remedy). Billy simply loved going to his grandma’s house. She always lavished care and concern on him, giving her undivided attention to whatever he might be interested in at the moment.

But when he became a teenager, Billy’s visits to Grandma’s house became less frequent. He had a driver’s license now, and his schedule was filled with sports and activities. Eventually his visits to Grandma’s house were only at Christmas, if at all. Soon the young adult named Bill had a demanding career, a family, and a life of his own.

And so it was that Grandma’s death came as something of a shock to Bill. The responsibility fell to him to dispose of her possessions and sell her house. Bill began to reflect in new ways about his grandmother and his family line. “Who was this woman?” he wondered. “Where did she come from? What people and values shaped her world?” It dawned on Bill that while she had shown great interest in every minor preoccupation of his life, he had never really known her as a person. Bill began to regret that in a profound way.

One day he was cleaning out his grandmother’s attic. His eyes fell on a large object in the corner: a cedar hope chest of the kind that, back in the old days, women received when they were married. Bill opened it with hushed expectation, like a pirate discovering long-lost treasure in the stories Grandma used to tell.

The chest was indeed filled with treasure but not the kind made of silver and gold. Bill first picked up an old baseball glove, which smelled richly of leather and oil. It had his long-deceased grandfather’s name handwritten on it. Next he examined a necklace with a finely crafted ivory locket hanging from the chain. Inside were two small pictures of Grandma and Grandpa. On the back the locket was engraved with the words, “Until I return.” But Grandpa had not returned from the war. A photo album of black-and-white pictures, now yellowed with age, told the full story of their lives—all the joys and sorrows, the light moments and memorable occasions, of lives lived in the real world.

At the bottom of the hope chest was a leather-bound family Bible inscribed with Grandma’s name. As Bill flipped the delicate pages, he discovered marginal notes and scraps of paper brimming with his grandmother’s prayers, wise observations, and private spiritual longings. Moisture gathered in Bill’s eyes as he remembered how she had offered him some of these same Christian observations—but only rarely, for Bill had typically been disinterested in such matters and quick to run off to the next game or activity. As he sat on his knees in front of the old hope chest, Bill berated himself, asking, “Why didn’t I take the time to explore this legacy when I had a chance?”

It is all too easy to let the past be crowded out by the urgencies of the present and the opportunities of the future. This is certainly true when it comes to the ancient church. We know there were famous Christians who lived “back then,” but we can’t quite put a finger on who they were or what they did. Something about the Romans and the lions and all that, right?

Yet despite our indifference to their world, we are inextricably bound to the church fathers. They are our spiritual ancestors, for better or worse. It is easy to go through life like Bill: vaguely aware of the past, yet too busy with present responsibilities to think about something as intangible as heritage. Yet, like Bill, we are missing real treasures if we do not explore our spiritual origins.

I wrote Getting to Know the Church Fathers to introduce modern people to the ancient Christians. If you lift the lid of the hope chest and take a peek inside, you won’t be disappointed by what you find inside.

—————————

Bryan M. Litfin (PhD, University of Virginia) is associate professor of theology at Moody Bible Institute.

For more information on Getting to Know the Church Fathers, click here.

Best of The Brazos Blog – Behind the Book

It is the one year anniversary of The Brazos Blog! To celebrate we are posting the best of the blog – along with a variety of giveaways (we will have one per day – see below).

Monday we highlighted our Between the Lines posts - featuring an interview w/ Miroslav Volf.
Yesterday we featured the various videos that have appeared on our blog – highlighting those with Lee C. Camp.

Today wish with to feature our Behind the Book posts.

Over the past year we have posted numerous original blog entries from Brazos authors that share the stories of the inspiration and background for their books. Authors who have shared Behind the Book posts include Daniel Taylor, Arthur Boers, and Elaine Heath.

In January of this year Peter Enns wrote a piece for The Brazos Blog titled “Why I Wrote The Evolution of Adam“. Here it is:

———————————————–

“Why I Wrote The Evolution of Adam” by Peter Enns

Many Christians are looking for ways to think clearly, deliberately, and differently about evolution and the Bible. There are several angles one can take to talk about this (e.g., theological, philosophical), and they all come into play. But I feel the most pressing issue Christians face is the hermeneutical one: if evolution is true, what do I do about what the Bible says about Adam and Eve?

I know many Christians who understand the scientific issues and are convinced that evolution explains human origins. They are looking for ways to read the Adam story differently. Many more—at least this is my experience—are open to the discussion, but are not ready simply to pull the trigger on evolution. They first need to see for themselves that the Adam story can be read with respect and reverence but without needing to read it as a literal account of human origins. Both groups are thinking hermeneutically, though they approach the issue from different sides.

So, as a biblical scholar who has always been keenly interested in the interface of ancient faith and contemporary life, I thought I would paint a bull’s-eye on my back and write a book trying to do just that.

I never really gave the topic of evolution any serious thought until 2009. I had just read Karl Giberson’s Saving Darwin and I was struck by how helpful it was, but also how much more convincing his arguments could be if they were in conversation of biblical scholarship and hermeneutical issues. He and I began corresponding, which eventually lead to my working at The BioLogos Foundation—first under Giberson and then under the current president Darrel Falk.

As I got deeper into the issue and began reading widely, I could see that, despite the many tremendous books out there on science and faith, few, if any, books were taking on the hermeneutical issues surrounding evolution—they weren’t dealing head on with the question, “How specifically do I read Genesis and Paul now that you’ve convinced me that evolution is true and that science and faith can live in harmony?”  In other words, the uneasy, awkward, piecemeal approach sometimes seen when Christians (especially evangelicals) talk about evolution stems from a failure to have an overt hermeneutical strategy for handling the Bible.

From the vantage point of academic biblical scholarship, I felt that such a strategy was sitting there all along, waiting patiently for someone to name it: read the Bible in historical context and see for yourself that the Bible is not remotely set up to contribute to any modern scientific discussions, including evolution.

This conclusion is, I feel, obvious: the pink elephant, 500-pound gorilla, and emperor with no clothes all rolled into one. And one needs no secret academic decoder ring to see it. A simple Google search will quickly yield a lot of information. We know enough today about the religious traditions of the ancient Mesopotamian world, of which Genesis was a part, to know that Genesis was produced by storytellers, not historians, anthropologists, or biologists. Ancient Israelites produced the story of Adam and Eve, and however you think of God’s role in inspiring these storytellers, the ancient Near Eastern-ness of it all must be kept front and center.

Likewise, astute readers of Paul in his historical context see clearly that he, like others of his time, felt quite free to appropriate and adapt creatively his scriptural tradition (our Old Testament) to serve his rhetorical and theological purposes. This is precisely what Paul does with Adam. Here too—however we might explain Paul’s being moved by God’s spirit—we must remember that the Paul that was so moved was a first century Jew who thought like a first century Jew, not a western evangelical.

As I see it, these observations about Genesis and Paul cannot be sidelined but must be brought front and center into the hermeneutical discussion over evolution. I say this for two reasons. First, these observations are hardly idiosyncratic or resting on thin ice, but are well-documented staples of biblical studies. Any discussion of the Bible and evolution that ignores or minimizes these factors in favor of defending familiar theological categories should be given no quarter. Second, these observations are well positioned to help provide the “theological vocabulary” for many Christians to begin their own hermeneutical journey of reading Genesis and Paul responsibly.

Of course, there is a downside to this type of discussion. Many readers seeking alternate ways forward experience tremendous cognitive dissonance and social pressure, for they are part of ecclesiastical communions that historically have not looked kindly at the kind of hermeneutical synthesis the evolution/Bible discussion requires. In fact, not to overstate, but there are theological and ecclesiastical bodies that have a vested interest in seeing to it that these conversations don’t happen.

I do not take the fact lightly, but I do think that a self-preservationist mindset is wrong, and, ironically, self-defeating in the long run.

———————————————–

Name One Thing That Gives You Life

Today we kick off a two-week feature on Arthur Boer’s Living Into Focus: Choosing What Matters In An Age of Distractions over at Patheos.com in their Book Club Section.

At Patheos you can find an excerpt from the book, author Q&A, and more.

Start by checking out this original article by Boers on “Life-Giving Practices: Identifying What Matters Most.”

Intrigued? Then think about what gives you life, and submit your thoughts (300 to 500 words) to Patheos (books@patheos.com) for possible inclusion on Patheos in their roundtable discussion on this book (and for a chance to get a free book).

 

Behind the Book: Peter Enns’s The Evolution of Adam

Today begins the week-long blog tour for Peter Enns’s new Brazos book The Evolution of Adam: What the Bible Does and Doesn’t Say about Human Origins. Check back all week as we will be updating as various bloggers review and engage with this important book.

To kick-off the tour, we asked Peter Enns to write a brief post for us on how the book came about.  Here is his reply:

—————————————————————

“Why I Wrote The Evolution of Adam” by Peter Enns

Many Christians are looking for ways to think clearly, deliberately, and differently about evolution and the Bible. There are several angles one can take to talk about this (e.g., theological, philosophical), and they all come into play. But I feel the most pressing issue Christians face is the hermeneutical one: if evolution is true, what do I do about what the Bible says about Adam and Eve?

I know many Christians who understand the scientific issues and are convinced that evolution explains human origins. They are looking for ways to read the Adam story differently. Many more—at least this is my experience—are open to the discussion, but are not ready simply to pull the trigger on evolution. They first need to see for themselves that the Adam story can be read with respect and reverence but without needing to read it as a literal account of human origins. Both groups are thinking hermeneutically, though they approach the issue from different sides.

So, as a biblical scholar who has always been keenly interested in the interface of ancient faith and contemporary life, I thought I would paint a bull’s-eye on my back and write a book trying to do just that.

I never really gave the topic of evolution any serious thought until 2009. I had just read Karl Giberson’s Saving Darwin and I was struck by how helpful it was, but also how much more convincing his arguments could be if they were in conversation of biblical scholarship and hermeneutical issues. He and I began corresponding, which eventually lead to my working at The BioLogos Foundation—first under Giberson and then under the current president Darrel Falk.

As I got deeper into the issue and began reading widely, I could see that, despite the many tremendous books out there on science and faith, few, if any, books were taking on the hermeneutical issues surrounding evolution—they weren’t dealing head on with the question, “How specifically do I read Genesis and Paul now that you’ve convinced me that evolution is true and that science and faith can live in harmony?”  In other words, the uneasy, awkward, piecemeal approach sometimes seen when Christians (especially evangelicals) talk about evolution stems from a failure to have an overt hermeneutical strategy for handling the Bible.

From the vantage point of academic biblical scholarship, I felt that such a strategy was sitting there all along, waiting patiently for someone to name it: read the Bible in historical context and see for yourself that the Bible is not remotely set up to contribute to any modern scientific discussions, including evolution.

This conclusion is, I feel, obvious: the pink elephant, 500-pound gorilla, and emperor with no clothes all rolled into one. And one needs no secret academic decoder ring to see it. A simple Google search will quickly yield a lot of information. We know enough today about the religious traditions of the ancient Mesopotamian world, of which Genesis was a part, to know that Genesis was produced by storytellers, not historians, anthropologists, or biologists. Ancient Israelites produced the story of Adam and Eve, and however you think of God’s role in inspiring these storytellers, the ancient Near Eastern-ness of it all must be kept front and center.

Likewise, astute readers of Paul in his historical context see clearly that he, like others of his time, felt quite free to appropriate and adapt creatively his scriptural tradition (our Old Testament) to serve his rhetorical and theological purposes. This is precisely what Paul does with Adam. Here too—however we might explain Paul’s being moved by God’s spirit—we must remember that the Paul that was so moved was a first century Jew who thought like a first century Jew, not a western evangelical.

As I see it, these observations about Genesis and Paul cannot be sidelined but must be brought front and center into the hermeneutical discussion over evolution. I say this for two reasons. First, these observations are hardly idiosyncratic or resting on thin ice, but are well-documented staples of biblical studies. Any discussion of the Bible and evolution that ignores or minimizes these factors in favor of defending familiar theological categories should be given no quarter. Second, these observations are well positioned to help provide the “theological vocabulary” for many Christians to begin their own hermeneutical journey of reading Genesis and Paul responsibly.

Of course, there is a downside to this type of discussion. Many readers seeking alternate ways forward experience tremendous cognitive dissonance and social pressure, for they are part of ecclesiastical communions that historically have not looked kindly at the kind of hermeneutical synthesis the evolution/Bible discussion requires. In fact, not to overstate, but there are theological and ecclesiastical bodies that have a vested interest in seeing to it that these conversations don’t happen.

I do not take the fact lightly, but I do think that a self-preservationist mindset is wrong, and, ironically, self-defeating in the long run.

———————————————————————–

Peter Enns (PhD, Harvard University) teaches biblical studies at Eastern University in St. Davids, Pennsylvania.  He has taught at several schools, including Princeton Theological Seminary, Fuller Theological Seminary, Temple University, and Westminster Theological Seminary. Enns has authored or edited numerous books, including Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament.

Behind the Book: Dan Taylor

This is Dan’s third of three posts on his new Brazos book, Creating a Spiritual Legacy.

One of the categories I suggest when encouraging people to list their ideas for stories centers on family holidays. Since we are in the Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Years season, make a list of traditions, practices, and specific events that you associate with these and other holidays.

Where did you generally meet for Thanksgiving or Christmas? Who was often there? What were favorite dishes served? Was their a usual order of events (open presents on Christmas Eve or Christmas Day)? We always had vegetable soup on Christmas Eve. I didn’t like vegetable soup, but since I knew we would be opening presents within an hour, it was my favorite meal of the year.

As well as thinking about what you usually did, give thought to specific holiday occasions. I remember the Christmas when I was 12. We didn’t have much money (I think we got foreclosed on not longer after) and the presents under the tree were sparse. When we three boys sorted them over and over again in the days before Christmas, as was our practice, we could tell they were mostly socks and other necessities. I figured I was old enough to take it like a man, so I feigned great enthusiasm for my new socks as we opened presents.

When all was opened—and it didn’t take long—my father sent my older brother out to the garage. He came back with a huge smile. Then it was my turn. I opened the door to the garage and there, sitting on a ping-pong table, were three new bikes. It took my breath away.

 Everyone has holiday stories—of delights and disasters and everything in between. Many of them convey important values, insights, and life lessons. Some are just fun to tell. Give it a shot.

Behind the Book: Dan Taylor

This is the second of three posts from Dan on his new Brazos book, Creating a Spiritual Legacy.

A short definition of a spiritual legacy is the passing of wisdom from generation (or person) to another. And the best single way to do that is through stories. It’s easy to convince people of that, but sometimes hard to get them to actually tell their stories—especially on paper. A common question arises: “Where do I start?”

 The answer is to start with everyday life experiences and what you have thought and felt about them—then and now. Then tell yourself, “I’ll write just one story.” Thinking you’re going to write your autobiography is the surest road to paralysis. Just one story. If you enjoy it, then you can think about a second one.

 But which story? That requires a little preliminary work. I suggest making lists.

 Start with what I call an “events list.” If it helps, start a series of sentences with “The time that . . .” and then finish the sentences. Range far and wide through your life. Include the stories you already tell orally. Include stories about other people as well as yourself, including family stories from before you were born, but which you heard repeated as a child.

 Then make a “character list.” Who are the people from your life who need to be preserved with a story? They can be people you know well or people you met only once, or perhaps saw at a distance. (I heard Bobby Kennedy speak a few days before he was assassinated and could write a story about it.) All you need at this point is a name or brief identifier.

 A third list can be a “values list.” Put down—in a single word or short phrase—values and virtues that are important to you. This will require some reflection. You should include your highest values—for instance, honesty, faith, courage, compassion—but also include other things you value: humor, adventure, creativity.

 Any one of these lists will provide you story after story, but your most powerful stories will come when your lists intersect. When a character from your character list is part of an event on your events list that suggests a value from your value list, that is a story you need to tell.

Behind the Book: Dan Taylor

In this first of three posts Dan Taylor introduces his new Brazos book and shares the story behind its birth.

I have written about spiritual legacy because I have myself been blessed by the spiritual legacy of others to me. As have you.

I first began thinking about spiritual legacy in the 1980’s when teaching life writing courses for seniors. In the beginning, I thought I was simply teaching a memoir course, letting people get some of their life down on paper. In reading their work, however, I discovered that they were telling powerful stories soaked in values, life lessons, and how they came to understand the world.

Most of these stories involved characters from their lives—family, friends, co-workers, teachers, and the like. I came to see how people are shaped by their stories and how stories are the primary vehicle for passing on what I came to see as a spiritual legacy.

It was also around this time that I became more keenly aware of the spiritual legacies that had shaped my own life. I come from a story-telling family, primarily because my father was a man who lived his life in light of the stories of his past (for better and worse). He was the main story-teller of the family, and once he discovered that I was likely to write some books, he started looking to me, I believe, to be the preserver of his stories.

Also in the 1980’s I wrote a book, Letters to My Children: A Father Passes on His Values, that explicitly tried to pass on values to my then young children through stories from my life. I wrote these letters with no thought of them being a book, but eventually they were collected. I had been blessed by the stories of others, and it was my turn to tell some of my own.

In the 1990’s I wrote another book, Tell Me a Story: The Life-Shaping Power of Our Stories, that explored how we all are shaped by the stories that surround us—from family, church, education, and popular culture. And I later helped start The Legacy Center, an organization devoted to helping people and institutions tell their stories.

So Creating a Spiritual Legacy grows out of a life time of learning and teaching about stories and how they tell us who we are and how to live. This new book is a practical, step-by-step guide to discovering your own spiritual legacy and contributing to the legacy of those you care about.

Behind the Book: Elaine Heath

© Love Photography

Dear Readers,

I wrote this book because, as a survivor of abuse, I wish something like it had been available for me to read when I began my own process of intentional healing. While there were a number of valuable therapeutic resources that did help me, I could not find any books that offered a healing and liberating interpretation of the Bible that was especially focused on the experiences, much less the wisdom, of survivors of sexual abuse. Nothing that I read suggested that survivors have a perspective on biblical interpretation that is sorely needed not just by other survivors, but by the entire church. Because no one told me I might have wisdom precisely because of my experience, I couldn’t properly honor my own story as a triumph of God’s power. It took so much longer to heal from the shame than it needed to! If I had been taught what is in this book, what a difference it would have made in coming into freedom and wholeness and in rejecting other forms of oppression in my life.

The evangelical books I read that addressed healing from sexual abuse seemed mostly oriented toward the brokenness of survivors, and survivors’ need to heal. Books focusing on sexuality in general tended to define sexual virtue in terms of chastity and lifelong monogamy with a heterosexual spouse. Conversely, sexual sin was defined as promiscuity, adultery, fornication, homosexuality, and divorce. I could not find any resources that named what I knew to be true: sexual abuse is not only a sexual sin, but is the worst sexual sin. I encountered the opposite problem in theologically liberal resources: a feminist critique of Scripture that rejected its authority because of its “unforgivable patriarchy.” For some of these books the Bible was nothing more than a religious artifact that contributed to the subjugation of women, children, and the earth.

My healing from abuse has been deeply embedded in my vocation as a theologian, pastor, and spiritual companion to others. Because I had the privilege of studying in diverse theological streams–evangelical, mainline Protestant, and Catholic–I gradually discovered many treasures from all these traditions that helped to open the Bible’s wealth of healing wisdom to me. Over the years, as I have served in ministry with other survivors, I have witnessed the healing power of the Bible in their lives, too.

This book is grounded in two commitments: first, the Bible can be a powerful source of healing for survivors of abuse. Second, survivors who are healing have essential theological wisdom that the whole church needs in order to be the people God has called us to be in this world.

With a prayer of trust that God is in the process of healing all wounds,

Elaine A. Heath